Documentary
Documentary-The story of the McRib
After overlooking how video essays are formatted and how to engage the audience during a video essay me Kenz and jack decided to do our own video essay on the story of the McRib this would follow the full story of the McRib from the beginning of its journey to were it is today this would mean me Kenz and jack would write our own scripts for ourselves to narrate over the video. I immediately dove in to researching the McRib in the past and how it has ended where it has today, we had to work with what we had this was not our first idea but we improvised as we didn't have the camera equipment we decided to blend two common types of documentary style filming participatory and a video essay our idea was that we will start the video telling the story of the McRib to immerse the audience in the story of the McRib this would follow all the way from its first release in 1984 to its journey throughout the mid 2000's and where it has ended up today. We would then move on to our participatory side of the documentary which would follow the same path as one of our original ideas which would be a bake off style type of filming we decided we would try replicate the McRib as close to the original as we possibly could.
Critical analysis-How Kanye west made “through the
wire
Firstly, I thought that this would be a great
choice for my critical analysis as this is a video essay which is also a participatory
documentary style very similar to our style. I think it does a great job at
setting the tone overall that it will follow and even tells us early on what
shall be done throughout this video, The video starts with background
information keeping the audience up to date so they can join in throughout the
video which is something that we personally would follow in the style of, giving
a backstory so that the demographic isn’t directly targeted at people who
already know so much and makes it easier for people with very little knowledge
on the topic to join in and give their own thoughts on the matter. Even though
the video is advertised as a making off, the video does a great job to bring
the audience along giving context so that when the time is finally reached to
show how he made it the audience feels much more invested in the topic.
Throughout the video it uses
many visual elements to make the story so much more immersive its very direct
you know as the audience when we are moving on to a new section. The use of
visual elements makes the video much more immersive, it makes it so much easier
to follow the narrative as well, I think it does a great job in the storytelling
part as not only is there a narrator but also the participatory side of the
video, this is great as it takes us as the audience on another side of the
journey. I think its also great at introducing the audience to sides of the
story they might of never heard before, something that we will try follow in
our own video essay but this is also very effective as it keeps the audience invested
throughout the process.
Critical analysis- Nathan
Fielder-The movement
This style of documentary is
very similar to our first idea which would be me as the subject talking to a
dating expert and then going on a date and using the tips that the dating
expert gave me to use, This video overall feels very self aware of its style I think
its fresh in that sense, everything suits the narrative the sudden jerky camera
movements suit the awkward dry atmosphere from Nathan Fielder throughout the video
, it also does a great job at setting the narrative straight away there's no
time wasted, The visual elements throughout help give more detail to the point Nathan
Fielder is trying to get across and also keeps the audience on track with the
narrative, the use of the music throughout and then breaking the music during
awkward points in the narrative makes the humor much more effective overall I think
it is very effective as everything suits the narrative the camera, sound everything
put together makes it much more effective
The history of the mcrib Final
evaluation
Overall I believe the process went well during the process, I
feel as though we could of done a better job planning outside of the process, it
wasn’t in our control that we didn’t have the camera equipment and I think we
did well to think on our feet and come up with a whole new idea on the spot and
for it to come out as it did, we did have many other concepts that we began development
on but they weren’t further developed we had a good idea going into it what we
were going to do based on our research there was a recurring theme of the participatory
documentary style kept coming back I think we knew we wanted to do something
together based on our original ideas we wanted to do something we could all be
a part of. You can see that from our early inspirations such as a Nathan fielder
style documentary or something such as the bake off, where we could all
participate in on it together. I believe we could of done a better job on organization
as well it was only me on time most of the day and even so it didn’t matter but
we could of cracked on earlier if we were there earlier and it would of given
us so much more time to think about the idea we are going to use since we don’t
have a camera, it could of given us so much more time to think but nevertheless
we had a concept that we came up with on the spot and given so I think we did a
great job with what we were dealt we didn’t have time for any shot lists as
this was on the day even having shot lists would of improved the production
much more but we simply had no time we
had to crack on straight away we have shot lists but not ones relevant to the
topic we ended up having to do, I take part of the blame in the reason for the unoriginization
I think although I was on time and was organized I think i disrupted the flow
of things since our first idea was to use me as the subject and we started
going down the path of following that idea getting pre-production documents
together for it, then I decided I didn’t want to do it which ultimately led to
a poor finished product worse then what could have been I think from this experience
I have learnt a valuable lesson is that being a good film maker means you have
to be just as good with everything else outside the production process even
things not involved in any part of the production process simply things such as
being punctual, I was never late but I do feel as though there wouldn’t even of
been need of these meet ups if I were to go with the original idea I feel as though
that would of given us way more time on our schedule so from this experience I would
say I have learnt to not change my mind drastically and when we have started production
you have to see it through.
Comments
Post a Comment